US GAAP
Also known as: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; FASB ASC
Body of accounting standards governing US financial reporting, codified in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles is the body of accounting standards governing financial reporting by US public companies, private entities following GAAP, and not-for-profits. Standard-setting authority moved from the AICPA's Committee on Accounting Procedure (1939) to the Accounting Principles Board (1959) to the independent Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in 1973, where it remains. In 2009 the FASB consolidated all extant pronouncements into the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), which is now the single authoritative source of nongovernmental US GAAP. The SEC has statutory authority to set US GAAP for SEC registrants but has historically delegated this to FASB while retaining rulemaking and interpretive power. US GAAP is rules-based relative to IFRS and carries detailed industry-specific guidance.
Core components
- FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topics 100-995
- Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS, pre-codification)
- ASUs (Accounting Standards Updates)
- Industry-specific topics (insurance, banking, real estate, software, etc.)
- Hierarchy of authoritative GAAP
- FASB-SEC interaction and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins
- Conceptual Framework underlying standard-setting
Primary use case
Financial reporting by US public companies registered with the SEC; GAAP-basis financial statements for private companies, lenders, and regulators; basis for audited financial statements under GAAS or PCAOB AS; input to tax provisioning, debt covenants, and financial analysis.
Common criticisms
- Rules-based orientation produces voluminous guidance and bright-line tests that encourage structuring transactions to fall just outside scope
- off-balance-sheet structures pre-2003 (Enron special-purpose entities) and lease accounting pre-ASC 842 illustrated the gameability problem
- convergence with IFRS stalled after 2014 leaving major differences in revenue recognition mechanics, leases, financial instruments, and impairment that complicate global comparison
- FASB's standard-setting process is criticized as slow and captured by large preparer constituencies
- the cost-benefit analysis underlying new standards has been challenged as opaque (e.g., academic critique of ASC 606 implementation costs)
- fair-value emphasis introduced procyclicality concerns during the 2008 financial crisis.
Lineage
- Parent of
- ASC 606, ASC 842, ASC 815, ASC 805
- Siblings
- IFRS, FASB Conceptual Framework, Statutory Accounting Principles, GASB, FASAB