GASB
Also known as: Governmental Accounting Standards Board
Body of accounting standards governing US state and local governmental entities, established in 1984.
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board is the independent body that establishes generally accepted accounting principles for US state and local governmental entities. Established in 1984 by the Financial Accounting Foundation as the public-sector counterpart to FASB, GASB issues Statements (binding GAAP), Interpretations, and Concepts Statements parallel to FASB's SFAC series. GASB standards differ structurally from FASB GAAP because governments operate without a profit motive, fund taxpayer-financed activities, and use fund accounting alongside government-wide statements. Major GASB pronouncements include Statement 34 (1999, the basic financial-reporting model), Statement 68 (pension liability recognition), and Statement 75 (other postemployment benefits). GASB has no statutory enforcement authority of its own; standards are enforced indirectly through state law, bond-rating agencies, federal grant requirements, and the AICPA's recognition of GASB as the authoritative standard-setter.
Core components
- GASB Statements (binding GAAP for state/local governments)
- GASB Concepts Statements (framework analogue to SFAC)
- Government-wide financial statements (accrual basis, economic resources focus)
- Fund financial statements (modified accrual for governmental funds)
- Required supplementary information including MD&A
- Net position classification (net investment in capital assets, restricted, unrestricted)
- Recognition of long-term liabilities including pensions and OPEB
Primary use case
Annual financial reporting by US states, counties, cities, school districts, and special districts; basis for Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFR/ACFR); input to municipal bond credit ratings and disclosure; compliance basis for federal grants under Single Audit; transparency to citizens and oversight bodies.
Common criticisms
- Pension and OPEB liability recognition (Statements 67, 68, 74, 75) revealed previously off-balance-sheet obligations many state and local governments had underfunded for decades, prompting political backlash and arguments that the actuarial assumptions GASB requires (particularly discount-rate selection) produce systematically biased estimates compared to corporate-finance norms (see Novy-Marx and Rauh 2009 for the alternative-discount-rate critique)
- the two-part reporting model (government-wide accrual plus fund-level modified accrual) produces complexity and reconciliation challenges that practitioners and academics argue undermine usefulness
- GASB lacks statutory enforcement, leaving compliance dependent on auditor judgment, bond market pressure, and state-level legal adoption
- small governments face implementation cost burdens disproportionate to user benefit
- convergence with FASB has been minimal, leaving governmental accounting structurally separate from corporate accounting.
Lineage
- Siblings
- US GAAP, FASAB, IPSAS, Fund Accounting