IPSAS
Also known as: International Public Sector Accounting Standards
International accounting standards for public sector entities, the public sector counterpart to IFRS.
International Public Sector Accounting Standards are accrual-basis accounting standards for public sector entities (national, regional, and local governments and their controlled entities, excluding government business enterprises) issued by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) under the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). IPSAS development began in 1996 as the public-sector counterpart to IFRS, and most IPSAS pronouncements are adapted from corresponding IFRS Standards, with modifications to reflect public-sector-specific issues such as non-exchange revenue (taxes, transfers), public-sector-specific assets (heritage, infrastructure, military), and the absence of a profit motive. IPSAS is voluntary; adoption is driven by governments, multilateral organizations (e.g., UN, EU institutions, OECD), and donor requirements. A separate Cash Basis IPSAS exists for jurisdictions not yet ready to adopt accrual.
Core components
- Accrual-basis IPSAS Standards (most adapted from corresponding IFRS)
- Cash Basis IPSAS (single standard for cash-basis reporters)
- Recommended Practice Guidelines (RPGs) on long-term fiscal sustainability, service performance reporting, and financial statement discussion
- IPSASB Conceptual Framework (issued in stages 2014)
- Public-sector-specific topics: non-exchange revenue (IPSAS 23), social benefits (IPSAS 42), heritage assets, infrastructure, and budget reporting (IPSAS 24)
Primary use case
Financial reporting by national governments and their entities (currently adopted by approximately 30 governments fully and many more partially); basis for UN system financial reporting since 2014; EU institutions' EPSAS project (proposed European Public Sector Accounting Standards) builds on IPSAS; reference framework in donor-funded public financial management reform; academic and policy reference in international government accounting research.
Common criticisms
- Adoption has been slow relative to IFRS in the corporate sphere — full accrual IPSAS adoption is uncommon and many self-claimed adopters apply IPSAS-similar rather than IPSAS-compliant standards (see Christiaens et al. 2015 academic review of European public-sector accounting)
- critics including political-economy scholars argue accrual public-sector accounting privileges market-based valuation logics inappropriate to sovereign entities and produces information less useful for legislative oversight than budgetary reporting (see Hyndman and Connolly 2011)
- the IFRS-derivation approach imports private-sector concepts (asset impairment, fair value, lease capitalization) that fit awkwardly with non-exchange and public-good contexts
- the IPSASB lacks the political authority of national standard-setters and depends on voluntary adoption, reducing uniformity in practice
- social benefits accounting (IPSAS 42) was contested for years before resolution and the chosen approach (recognition only when eligibility conditions are met) leaves significant social-policy obligations off balance sheet.
Lineage
- Siblings
- IFRS, GASB, FASAB, Fund Accounting
- Derived from
- IFRS