IFRS
Also known as: International Financial Reporting Standards
IASB's body of accounting standards used across most of the developed world outside the United States.
International Financial Reporting Standards are the accounting standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), the standard-setting body of the IFRS Foundation. The IASB succeeded the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) in 2001, inheriting and gradually replacing the earlier International Accounting Standards (IAS) series. IFRS adoption accelerated after the 2002 EU regulation requiring listed-company consolidated statements to use IFRS from 2005, and IFRS is now used in over 140 jurisdictions including the EU, UK, Australia, Canada, and most of Asia and Africa. The United States has not adopted IFRS for domestic registrants, though the SEC permits foreign private issuers to file IFRS statements. IFRS is generally described as more principles-based than US GAAP, though the distinction is contested.
Core components
- IFRS Standards 1-19 (post-2001 IASB pronouncements)
- IAS Standards (legacy IASC pronouncements still in force)
- IFRIC and SIC Interpretations
- IFRS for SMEs (separate standard for non-publicly-accountable entities)
- IASB Conceptual Framework
- Endorsement processes in adopting jurisdictions (e.g., EFRAG/EU)
Primary use case
Financial reporting by listed companies in 140+ jurisdictions; consolidated reporting by multinationals operating across IFRS-adopting countries; foreign private issuers filing with SEC under IFRS; basis for cross-border financial analysis and capital allocation.
Common criticisms
- The principles-based vs rules-based distinction has been challenged empirically (Schipper 2003) — IFRS contains substantial detailed guidance and US GAAP substantial principles language
- convergence with US GAAP stalled after 2014 with major divergences remaining in revenue recognition application, lease lessor accounting, financial-instrument impairment (IFRS 9 expected-credit-loss vs ASC 326 CECL), and goodwill impairment
- carve-outs in adopting jurisdictions (notably the EU's IAS 39 carve-out) undermined the 'single set of standards' premise
- principles-based standards produce comparability concerns when issuers exercise judgment differently
- the IFRS Foundation's funding model relies on contributions from accounting firms and regulated entities, raising independence questions
- endorsement delay and modification by jurisdictions (e.g., EU's IFRS 17 endorsement debate) creates de facto variants.
Lineage
- Parent of
- IFRS 15, IFRS 16, IFRS 17
- Siblings
- US GAAP, IASB Conceptual Framework, IPSAS, IFRS 9