PRINCE2 Agile
AXELOS framework composing PRINCE2 governance with agile delivery techniques drawn primarily from DSDM and Scrum.
PRINCE2 Agile is the AXELOS framework composing PRINCE2's project-governance structure with agile delivery techniques drawn principally from DSDM and Scrum. First published in June 2015 as a guide and certification scheme, it preserves the seven PRINCE2 principles, themes, and processes while tailoring them for agile delivery contexts — using DSDM's MoSCoW prioritization and fixed-time-and-cost-with-flexible-scope approach, integrating Scrum events and artifacts where appropriate, and providing the Agilometer assessment tool for evaluating project agile readiness. PRINCE2 Agile is positioned as a wrapper rather than a replacement: it argues that PRINCE2 governance is necessary at the project level (business case, exception management, stage boundaries) while delivery within stages can be conducted with agile methods. The Practitioner certification builds on PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Core components
- Seven PRINCE2 principles, themes, and processes retained at project level
- Tailoring guidance for agile delivery within stages
- MoSCoW prioritization (Must, Should, Could, Won't have this time) from DSDM
- Cynefin Framework integration for context assessment
- Agilometer assessment of project agile readiness
- Five targets (be on time and hit deadlines
- protect the level of quality
- embrace change
- keep teams stable
- accept that the customer doesn't need everything)
- Behaviours, frameworks, concepts, focus areas, and techniques structure
Primary use case
Project management for organizations subject to PRINCE2 governance requirements (UK public sector, AXELOS-aligned corporates) needing to deliver work using agile methods; basis for the PRINCE2 Agile Foundation and Practitioner certifications; reference framework for hybrid project delivery in regulated and contracted environments; consulting and training market integration of PRINCE2 and agile communities.
Common criticisms
- PRINCE2 Agile has been criticized by parts of the agile community as a governance overlay that does not embody agile values — Ron Jeffries-style critiques, articulated also by Andresen, Conboy, and others, argue that preserving stage boundaries, exception reports, and documented business cases introduces ceremony agile methods were designed to remove
- from the PRINCE2 side, critics argue the framework dilutes PRINCE2's product-based planning rigor without providing equivalent control mechanisms in agile contexts
- the Agilometer's empirical validity has not been independently established
- the framework's positioning as 'PRINCE2 plus agile techniques' makes it dependent on the underlying PRINCE2 framework, inheriting PRINCE2 critiques
- commercial AXELOS / PeopleCert certification pricing is contested
- integration with Disciplined Agile and SAFe (which occupy adjacent hybrid-framework territory) is awkward, with practitioners reporting framework-selection confusion
- empirical evidence of effectiveness is dominated by AXELOS-affiliated case studies.
Lineage
- Child of
- PRINCE2
- Siblings
- DSDM, Disciplined Agile, PRINCE2
- Derived from
- PRINCE2, DSDM, Scrum