Integral Serialism
Also known as: Total Serialism
Mid-20th-century extension of twelve-tone technique applying serial organization to rhythm, dynamics, and articulation, associated with Boulez and Stockhausen.
Integral Serialism (also Total Serialism) is the mid-20th-century extension of twelve-tone technique that applies serial organization not only to pitch but also to rhythm (durations), dynamics (loudness), articulation, and sometimes register and timbre. The approach emerged near-simultaneously in Europe and the United States in the late 1940s and early 1950s: Olivier Messiaen's Mode de valeurs et d'intensités (1949) provided the catalytic European model with its serialized pitch, duration, dynamic, and attack modes; Pierre Boulez's Structures Ia (1952) and Structure II (1956-61) developed integral serialism rigorously; Karlheinz Stockhausen's Kreuzspiel (1951) and Klavierstücke I-IV (1952-53) produced parallel German developments; Milton Babbitt's earlier Three Compositions for Piano (1947) had independently extended serial principles to rhythm in the United States. By the late 1950s and 1960s integral serialism had become the dominant mode of European avant-garde composition before its progressive softening and abandonment from the 1970s onward.
Core components
- Serialization of multiple parameters: pitch, duration, dynamic, articulation, sometimes register and timbre
- Rhythmic series (parallel to pitch row): ordered sequence of distinct duration values
- Dynamic series (ordered sequence of distinct loudness values)
- Articulation series (staccato, legato, accent, etc., as discrete categories)
- Boulez's permutation matrix for systematic combination of parameter series
- Babbitt's twelve-tone-rhythm permutation independent of European developments
- Distinction between strict and free integral-serial composition
- Aesthetic premise: maximum non-repetition and structural unity from small generative elements
Primary use case
Compositional foundation for European postwar avant-garde (Boulez, Stockhausen, Nono, Maderna, Pousseur, Berio early period); American serial composition tradition centered on Princeton (Babbitt, Wuorinen, Martino); framework for Darmstadt summer course teaching c.1950-1965; academic reference in 20th-century music history, composition pedagogy, and music-theoretical research; intellectual foundation for subsequent post-serial European composition.
Common criticisms
- Integral serialism's rigorous-system claims have been substantially contested — György Ligeti's 'Pierre Boulez: Decision and Automatism in Structure 1a' (1958) demonstrated that Structure Ia, despite its serial rigor, produced surface results indistinguishable from random successions, an analytical critique that influenced subsequent compositional reaction
- Boulez's own subsequent compositional path (toward Pli selon pli, Eclat, Rituel, and the IRCAM electronic-acoustic synthesis) reflected dissatisfaction with the systematic constraints of integral serialism
- Stockhausen's later moment-form, intuitive-music, and ritual-music developments similarly abandoned strict integral serialism
- audience-reception problems were severe and well-documented
- the rationalist universalist project of integral serialism was substantially critiqued by the 1968-era political and aesthetic turn (Cardew's 'Stockhausen Serves Imperialism', the experimental-music movement)
- academic-institutional dominance of integral serialism in postwar European music education has been argued (Susan McClary, Joseph Auner) to have marginalized tonal and other alternatives beyond what musical merit alone justified
- gender and racial homogeneity of the canonical integral-serialist composers reflects institutional access patterns of the period.
Lineage
- Child of
- Twelve-Tone Technique
- Siblings
- Pitch-Class Set Theory
- Derived from
- Twelve-Tone Technique