Fugue
Also known as: Fugal Procedure
Imitative contrapuntal procedure organized around a subject answered in related voices, formalized through Bach's practice and subsequent theoretical codification.
Fugue is the imitative contrapuntal procedure organized around a subject answered in related voices according to characteristic conventions of answer (real or tonal), countersubject, episode, stretto, and tonal departure-and-return. Fugue is procedure rather than fixed form: each fugue develops uniquely from its subject, with no required number of episodes or stretto entries. The procedure crystallized through Baroque practice — Frescobaldi's ricercars, Buxtehude's organ works, and the works of Bach's predecessors — and was canonized through Johann Sebastian Bach's compositions, particularly Das Wohltemperierte Klavier (1722, 1742), Die Kunst der Fuge (1751), and the late organ works. Theoretical codification appeared in Friedrich Wilhelm Marpurg's Abhandlung von der Fuge (1753-1754) and subsequent treatises. Fugue retained importance through the Classical era (Mozart's K.546, Haydn's late quartets), Romantic era (Beethoven's late works including the Grosse Fuge, Brahms), and into the 20th century (Hindemith, Shostakovich's Op.87, Britten).
Core components
- Subject (theme stated in single voice in tonic)
- Answer (subject restated in second voice, real answer transposing exactly to dominant or tonal answer adjusting interval to remain in key)
- Countersubject (recurrent counterpoint accompanying subject after first exposition)
- Exposition (initial subject-answer-subject-answer entries in all voices)
- Episodes (sequential or modulatory passages between subject entries)
- Middle entries (subject statements in related keys)
- Stretto (overlapping subject entries before completion)
- Inversion, augmentation, diminution as subject transformations
- Pedal point and cadential closing
Primary use case
Foundational contrapuntal procedure in Baroque keyboard, choral, and instrumental music; compositional study tool for advanced counterpoint pedagogy; analytical framework for Bach's instrumental works and parallel Baroque and post-Baroque fugal compositions; academic reference in music-theory and music-cognition research; performance-interpretation framework for Baroque and Classical fugal repertoire.
Common criticisms
- The textbook fugue (with strict exposition pattern, regular episode structure, and standardized answer formation) is substantially a pedagogical idealization — Bach's actual fugues vary substantially from the textbook description, with George Buelow, Joel Lester, Paul Walker, and Christoph Wolff documenting in different ways how the formal regularities the textbook ascribes to fugue often do not appear consistently even in Bach's works
- Marpurg's codification was criticized in its own time as imposing rules J.S. Bach himself did not follow, with the Bach-Marpurg correspondence and subsequent C.P.E. Bach commentary illustrating the tension
- modern fugue pedagogy that emphasizes 'rules of fugue' produces academic exercises rather than musically compelling fugues, a critique going back at least to Heinrich Schenker and continuing in modern compositional pedagogy debates
- the procedure's predominant historical association with German organ and keyboard tradition obscures Italian, French, and English fugal practice with substantially different conventions
- analyzing post-Baroque fugues (Beethoven Grosse Fuge, Brahms Op.18 finale, Shostakovich Op.87) requires extensions of the basic model that make the textbook description inadequate
- fugue's role in modern compositional practice is contested between those who treat it as a historical procedure and those who treat it as a living technique.
Lineage
- Siblings
- Sonata Form, Species Counterpoint