Enneagram
Also known as: Enneagram of Personality
Nine interconnected personality types with wings, instincts, and integration arrows.
The Enneagram of Personality is a typology of nine interconnected character structures arranged on a nine-pointed geometric figure (the enneagram), each defined by a core motivation, characteristic fear, and habitual ego strategy. The modern Enneagram synthesis emerged through Bolivian-born Oscar Ichazo's teachings at the Arica School in the 1960s-70s, drawing on Gurdjieff's earlier use of the enneagram symbol within the Fourth Way teaching, and was substantially psychologized by Chilean psychiatrist Claudio Naranjo and subsequently by figures including Don Riso, Russ Hudson, Helen Palmer, and Richard Rohr. The model includes wings (adjacent types influencing the core), instinctual subtypes (self-preservation, social, sexual), integration and disintegration arrows showing movement under growth and stress, and levels of psychological development within each type. The Enneagram has substantial practitioner and contemplative-spiritual following but lacks peer-reviewed psychometric validation, and academic personality research has not corroborated the nine-type structure.
Core components
- Nine personality types arranged on enneagram figure
- Three centers (head/thinking, heart/feeling, gut/instinct)
- Wings (adjacent type influence)
- Three instinctual subtypes (self-pres, social, sexual)
- Integration arrow (direction in growth)
- Disintegration arrow (direction under stress)
- Levels of psychological development (Riso-Hudson)
- Type-specific core fears and desires
Primary use case
Self-development and self-knowledge work; spiritual and contemplative direction; team and relationship dynamics in coaching and organizational consulting; integration in some Christian, Sufi, and Buddhist contemplative practices; popular self-typing through commercial assessments.
Common criticisms
- No peer-reviewed psychometric validation of the nine-type structure
- the most widely-used assessment instruments (RHETI, others) have weak independent psychometric evaluation
- type stability across testing varies
- correspondence with established personality dimensions (Big Five, HEXACO) is partial and contested
- commercial certification industry creates incentives to overclaim validation
- often presented as scientifically established when the empirical support is absent
- risk of confirmation bias in self-typing
- conflation of Gurdjieff's original symbolic use with the modern personality system
- tradition's depth and contemplative seriousness sometimes obscured by personality-quiz commercialization.
Lineage
- Siblings
- DISC Assessment, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator