Efficient Market Hypothesis
Also known as: EMH
Fama's hypothesis that asset prices fully reflect available information.
The Efficient Market Hypothesis, formalized by Eugene Fama in his 1970 review article, holds that financial asset prices fully reflect available information, with the implication that systematic above-market returns net of risk are not achievable through information-based trading. Fama distinguished three forms — weak (past prices already reflected), semi-strong (all public information reflected), and strong (all information including private reflected) — with progressively stronger empirical claims. The hypothesis is empirically challenging because it must be tested jointly with an asset-pricing model (the joint hypothesis problem), and the steady accumulation of cross-sectional anomalies (size, value, momentum) led to factor-model extensions and behavioral-finance critiques most prominently from Robert Shiller, who shared the 2013 Nobel with Fama in a notable acknowledgment of the unresolved tension. The strong form is widely rejected; weaker forms remain operationally influential, particularly as the basis for index investing.
Core components
- Weak form (past prices)
- Semi-strong form (public information)
- Strong form (all information including private)
- Joint hypothesis problem (jointly with asset-pricing model)
- Random walk in returns
- Rational expectations foundation
- Information-arbitrage equilibrium
Primary use case
Foundation of modern finance and asset pricing; intellectual basis for index investing and passive management; legal applications including the fraud-on-the-market doctrine in securities litigation; benchmark for active-management evaluation.
Common criticisms
- Cross-sectional anomalies (size, value, momentum, low-volatility) challenge cross-sectional efficiency
- bubbles and crashes (1987, 2000, 2008) appear inconsistent with informationally efficient prices
- behavioral finance critique (Shiller, Thaler) on excess volatility and predictability
- joint hypothesis problem makes clean tests impossible
- strong form clearly rejected (insider information predicts returns)
- LTCM and 2008 raised practitioner doubts.
Lineage
- Siblings
- Modern Portfolio Theory, Capital Asset Pricing Model